Week 2360 of Occupation Daniel Breslau
The Palestinian modest proposal postponed
Through the Palestinian Authority Prime Minister, it was announced last week that the Palestinians would not submit a formal application to the UN General Assembly for recognition as a non-member state at this time.
The Fatah-led Palestinian Authority treads a very thin line. For years it has struggled to find the balance between pleasing its funders and clinging to what remains of its credibility in the eyes of the people it represents; or between suppressing resistance and channeling popular anger. It is both an agent of the occupation and leading a national liberation movement.
For the last two years, Mahmoud Abbas and the Fatah leadership in the PA thought they had found a successful formula for containing these tensions. They would repress militant resistance groups in the West Bank, including not only Hamas, but its Fatah-affiliated fighters as well. But they would carry on the national struggle on the diplomatic level. This meant pulling out of the discredited “peace process” (Fall of 2010) as long as Israel continued expanding its settlements on occupied Palestinian land. And it would pursue statehood on the international stage, through the United Nations. The reasoning was that the more the Palestinian leadership behaved like a government, rather than a resistance movement, the more likely it was to advance its agenda in international forums.
US President Barack Obama has been the major reason for the failure of the PA/Fatah strategy. At the height of Palestinian optimism about bringing the case for statehood to the UN, in Fall of 2011, Obama said that despite his support for a Palestinian state in the pre-1967 borders, the Palestinians must seek this outcome in negotiations with the one government in the world that is committed to preventing its realization. Presented with the choice of Obama’s veto in the UN security council or Israel’s veto at the negotiating table.
So now the PA, almost a year later, is proceeding with plan B, to apply for observer status in the General Assembly. Here a majority is assured, there is no US veto, but the decision would grant the Palestinians something far short of recognition as a member state. Yet this week even this modest substitute move has now been delayed due to the desire not to antagonize Obama as he runs for re-election in November.
The great flaw in the Palestinian approach is in even increasing the dependence of the national movement on powerful patrons. And as long as there is relative calm in Palestine, thanks to the Palestinian Authority and even Hamas, the powerful patrons are focused on their domestic problems and the economic crisis.
Incidentally, the Palestinian diplomatic campaign once again explodes the Israeli lie that the Palestinians are not interested in coexistence with Israel. The global system of nation-states, embodied in international law and the UN, insists that, once recognized, borders are permanent and inviolable. This is an absolutely necessary principle of international law, because it eliminates the temptation for states to go to war to expand their own territories. For the Palestinians to obtain recognition of statehood within the pre-1967 borders would be to make a binding commitment to those borders indefinitely.
Incitement part II
Hebrew Source: http://www.haaretz.co.il/literature/1.1810795
|