By: Gideon Spiro Red Rag Weekly Column 22 June 2014 (English translation 28 June)
On solidarity and kidnappings
When the affair of the kidnapping of the three young settlers began, Razi Barkai, the head broadcaster of the military radio station Galei Tzahal interviewed Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi Lau Junior (he inherited his position from his father). The rabbi went to the studio directly from a rally at the Western Wall in solidarity with the kidnapped men, and he waxed lyrical in praise of the wonderful People of Israel and its solidarity in times of hardship. At the same time, the parents of the kidnapped men, religious settlers of the “knitted kippa” kind, were interviewed, and they thanked the army and the government “who are doing all they can” to find the kidnapped men, and honey dripped from their tongues over the love they receive “from all the sectors of the People”, and if only they could, they would “hug the People of Israel; but since that is no simple matter, they must settle for a virtual hug.
I do not have a gram of solidarity with racists at all and antisemites in particular, I have no solidarity with fascists, neo-Nazis, religious extremism, tyranny and parents who are willing to sacrifice their children on the altar of those values. I have no solidarity with thieves, racists or plunderers. For those reasons I cannot express solidarity with settlers, or the Jewish Home party or the Hamas movement, the founding charter of which contains passages extracted from the fabrications of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
I have a great deal of solidarity with supporters of human rights and democracy, with those who struggle for social justice, for a world free of pollution, with those who fight against tyrannical regimes, with activists for the elimination of poverty and corruption and for medical care for all. I feel solidarity with the tortured and those who groan under the cruel hands of dictators, be they domestic oppressors or foreign occupiers. And therefore it is but natural that my solidarity should be with the Palestinian woman who stands with her baby for hours at checkpoints on her way to the doctor and is forced to undergo the indignities of humiliation by the soldiers of the Israeli Occupation.
Does this mean that I am indifferent to the fate of the kidnapped men? Certainly not. I hope they are among the living. The right to life is not a function of a person’s political outlook. It is an absolute right. The kidnappers did not consult with me in advance of the kidnapping, so I do not know what their objective was. Was it reprisal for the killing of two 16-year- old Palestinian youths in Beitunia in a Nakba Day demonstration (which an army spokesman lied about when he said that live ammunition was not fired; the autopsies showed that live ammunition was indeed fired)? If so, then I fear that the kidnappers have acted as did the Irgun (Etzel) underground, which hanged five British soldiers in revenge, and the kidnapped men are no longer among the living. However, if the objective of the kidnapping was an exchange of prisoners, that is, the kidnapped men are to be freed in return for the freedom of Palestinian captives, especially the administrative detainees who are on a hunger-strike, in that case this is a legitimate resistance operation by the occupied for liberation from the bonds of the Occupation.
The ugly punitive actions of the Occupation army – the detention of hundreds without trial, collective punishment, home invasions without any court order, destruction of private and public property and theft of money and jewelry are all intended, among other things, to put the kidnappers under so much pressure that they execute the three, and Israel will then get corpses where it could have received living human beings. Israel wants corpses. No propaganda technique is more effective for deepening racism and hatred of Arabs. The mother of one of the kidnapped men has already expressed herself in terms of `do not break, even if it means that the boys don’t come back`. That is one of the characteristic signs of the insanity of the `Greater Land of Israel`, the cult of death, the willingness to sacrifice children for sinister objectives. In more modern Hebrew: like `grease on the wheels of the revolution.` On the issue of Gilad Shalit, Hamas failed to fulfil the role the government of Israel assigned it, that is, to return him as a corpse. They kept him alive for five years until a public movement, secular for the most part, forced the government into a prisoner-exchange.
When the government of Israel complains about kidnapping as an act of terror, it is like a man who has been convicted of murdering his parents and then asks for the court’s mercy because he is an orphan. Israel is rich in kidnappings. In the 1950s Israel kidnapped from France an Israeli air force officer who was suspected of transmitting secret information. He was not put on trial and not convicted, which did not prevent his kidnappers form carrying out the death penalty and throwing him into the sea to be food for the fish. Maybe that criminal act was the inspiration for the junta of fascist generals in Argentina 20 years later to adopt the method and throw from aircraft into the sea hundreds of opponents of the regime, including many Jews. The Begin/Sharon government maintained friendly relations with the criminals of that military junta and exported military supplies to it.
In the First Lebanon War Israel abducted Lebanese hostages, supposedly as bargaining chips for the return of the Israel air force navigator Ron Arad. But in fact that was a diversionary tactic that was intended to blur the fact that when was possible to return him Israel refused to pay the price, and when Israel claimed to be willing, he was no longer alive. Israel hoped to receive a corpse and did not even get that much in the end. Organizations emerged, claiming that the man is still alive and offering rewards of millions of dollars, but that was a shoddy distraction.
Mordechai Vanunu, an Israeli citizen, was kidnapped in act of terror by the Israeli government in European territory in violation of international conventions and extradition treaties, and Israel continues to torment him to this very day.
Since the beginning of the Occupation in June 1967 Israel has turned into a kidnapping superpower. Hardly a day passes without kidnappings. Soldiers of the Occupation kidnap children from their beds in the middle of the night, they kidnap students from their schools, women and old people from their homes and young people from their work-places, and some know they are being sought and so they hide. Kidnappings have been run through the language-sanitizer of the Occupation and so they are called `detention of suspects`, but in reality it is nothing but kidnapping for all practical purposes.
Some will say: kidnapping that the army does under the rubric of the arrest of suspects is not terrorism, but kidnapping by Palestinian resistance groups is terrorism. Supporters of human rights cannot accept that distinction. The slogan `the Occupation is terrorism` reflects the situation in reality.
As these lines are being written, the identity of the kidnappers is still unknown. No organization has claimed responsibility. The Hamas movement denies that it has a hand in it. We would do well to look into whether some kind of internal provocation is going on. The Occupation and the Occupied Territories have provided us with a great many criminals such as the Jewish terror underground (Hagai Segal), Yigal Amir, the murderer of Prime Minister Rabin, Dr. Goldstein, who murdered Muslim worshippers as they were praying in the Cave of the Patriarchs, the Bat Ayin underground and the book-burners and mosque-burners among the “Price Tag” rioters. If I count all the murderers and rioters among the settlers, this list would increase threefold. In view of these phenomena, a scenario in which a settler who hears voices from heaven and converses with God, for Whom any negotiations with any Palestinian party constitutes an existential danger and treason, planned the kidnapping, and if necessary even to sacrifice the victims on the altar of the Moloch of the Territories, with the knowledge that responsibility will be laid at the Palestinians’ door, with all that that implies.
As for the rabbis of the settlements, it can be said of them what Professor Yeshayahu Liebowitz said about the Lubavitcher Rebbe: `I have not yet decided if he is a psychopath or a con-man.` There can always be found some rabbinical con-man who will give a halachic ruling in support of the satanic agenda, if not directly, then by roundabout means, which will be interpreted by some fool among his followers as `biblical wisdom` and permission to proceed.
Psychopathic rabbis, the likes of whom we have already seen in action when they gave halachic authorization to the assassin Yigal Amir. I do not claim that is what has happened this time, but based on past experience it is worth looking into.
No surprises from the establishment media. The radio and television channels and the print media (except the newspaper Haaretz) enlisted themselves in the service of the army spokesman. Every channel had its own general who served as pundit. Whoever surfed between the channels discovered that they all say similar things. Press conferences with the Prime Minister, the Defence Minister and the Chief of Staff take place without questions. North Korea- style brainwashing. Razi Barkai, from the military radio station mentioned above, interviewed Knesset Member Issawi Freij of the Meretz Party, who condemned the kidnapping, but added some context such as the Occupation and the lack of a political horizon that can give hope to the Palestinians. Issawi is an Israeli Arab, and the honourable broadcaster Barkai, seeing an opportunity to strike a sanctimonious pose, asked him: `Why are you going round in circles instead of just saying `Hamas is shit`?` In other words: why don’t you say what I dictate to you? MK Freij is a cultured person and so he did not tell the military broadcaster what should have been said: why don’t you say that the Jewish Home party is shit, the Occupation is shit, all who have a part in the Occupation are shit and the settlements are shit, and say it all live on the air. Then we’ll talk. If they fire you, you’ll be OK, because you have already accumulated a pension of 70%.
And of course there was the seasonal attack on MK Hanin Zoabi, who said what is obvious: the Occupation is the fertile dung from which the kidnappings sprouted.
Translated for Occupation Magazine by George Malent
gm |